Greedy Sampling Is Provably Efficient for RLHF

Di Wu, Chengshuai Shi, Jing Yang, Cong Shen
10/28/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.IT

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a key technique for post-training large language models. Despite its empirical success, the theoretical understanding of RLHF is still limited, as learning the KL-regularized target with only preference feedback poses additional challenges compared with canonical RL. Existing works mostly study the reward-based Bradley-Terry (BT) preference model, and extend classical designs utilizing optimism or pessimism. This work, instead, considers the general preference model (whose practical relevance has been observed recently) and obtains performance guarantees with major, order-wise improvements over existing ones. Surprisingly, these results are derived from algorithms that directly use the empirical estimates (i.e., greedy sampling), as opposed to constructing optimistic or pessimistic estimates in previous works. This insight has a deep root in the unique structural property of the optimal policy class under the KL-regularized target, and we further specialize it to the BT model, highlighting the surprising sufficiency of greedy sampling in RLHF.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wu2025greedy,
  title  = {Greedy Sampling Is Provably Efficient for RLHF},
  author = {Di Wu and Chengshuai Shi and Jing Yang and Cong Shen},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.24700},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24700v1},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.24700.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.24700)

Discussion