RLMEval: Evaluating Research-Level Neural Theorem Proving

Auguste Poiroux, Antoine Bosselut, Viktor Kunčak
10/29/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Despite impressive results on curated benchmarks, the practical impact of large language models (LLMs) on research-level neural theorem proving and proof autoformalization is still limited. We introduce RLMEval, an evaluation suite for these tasks, focusing on research-level mathematics from real-world Lean formalization projects. RLMEval targets the evaluation of neural theorem proving and proof autoformalization on challenging research-level theorems by leveraging real Lean Blueprint formalization projects. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art models on RLMEval, comprising 613 theorems from 6 Lean projects, reveals a significant gap: progress on existing benchmarks does not readily translate to these more realistic settings, with the best model achieving only a 10.3 % pass rate. RLMEval provides a new, challenging benchmark designed to guide and accelerate progress in automated reasoning for formal mathematics.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{poiroux2025rlmeval,
  title  = {RLMEval: Evaluating Research-Level Neural Theorem Proving},
  author = {Auguste Poiroux and Antoine Bosselut and Viktor Kunčak},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.25427},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25427v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.25427.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.25427)

Discussion