How Regularization Terms Make Invertible Neural Networks Bayesian Point Estimators

Nick Heilenkötter
10/30/2025
cs.LGmath.NA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Can regularization terms in the training of invertible neural networks lead to known Bayesian point estimators in reconstruction? Invertible networks are attractive for inverse problems due to their inherent stability and interpretability. Recently, optimization strategies for invertible neural networks that approximate either a reconstruction map or the forward operator have been studied from a Bayesian perspective, but each has limitations. To address this, we introduce and analyze two regularization terms for the network training that, upon inversion of the network, recover properties of classical Bayesian point estimators: while the first can be connected to the posterior mean, the second resembles the MAP estimator. Our theoretical analysis characterizes how each loss shapes both the learned forward operator and its inverse reconstruction map. Numerical experiments support our findings and demonstrate how these loss-term regularizers introduce data-dependence in a stable and interpretable way.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{heilenktter2025regularization,
  title  = {How Regularization Terms Make Invertible Neural Networks Bayesian Point Estimators},
  author = {Nick Heilenkötter},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.26704},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26704v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.26704.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.26704)

Discussion