LingGym: How Far Are LLMs from Thinking Like Field Linguists?

Changbing Yang, Franklin Ma, Freda Shi, Jian Zhu
11/1/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper introduces LingGym, a new benchmark that evaluates LLMs' capacity for meta-linguistic reasoning using Interlinear Glossed Text (IGT) and grammatical descriptions extracted from 18 typologically diverse reference grammars. Unlike previous work that focuses on specific downstream tasks, we assess whether LLMs can generalize linguistic inference across low-resource languages and structures not seen during training. We present a controlled evaluation task: Word-Gloss Inference, in which the model must infer a missing word and gloss from context using varying levels of linguistic information (e.g., glosses, grammatical explanations, translations). Our results show that incorporating structured linguistic cues leads to consistent improvements in reasoning performance across all models. This work highlights both the promise and current limitations of using LLMs for typologically informed linguistic analysis and low-resource language documentation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{yang2025linggym,
  title  = {LingGym: How Far Are LLMs from Thinking Like Field Linguists?},
  author = {Changbing Yang and Franklin Ma and Freda Shi and Jian Zhu},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.00343},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00343v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.00343.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.00343)

Discussion