Red-teaming Activation Probes using Prompted LLMs

Phil Blandfort, Robert Graham
11/1/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Activation probes are attractive monitors for AI systems due to low cost and latency, but their real-world robustness remains underexplored. We ask: What failure modes arise under realistic, black-box adversarial pressure, and how can we surface them with minimal effort? We present a lightweight black-box red-teaming procedure that wraps an off-the-shelf LLM with iterative feedback and in-context learning (ICL), and requires no fine-tuning, gradients, or architectural access. Running a case study with probes for high-stakes interactions, we show that our approach can help discover valuable insights about a SOTA probe. Our analysis uncovers interpretable brittleness patterns (e.g., legalese-induced FPs; bland procedural tone FNs) and reduced but persistent vulnerabilities under scenario-constraint attacks. These results suggest that simple prompted red-teaming scaffolding can anticipate failure patterns before deployment and might yield promising, actionable insights to harden future probes.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{blandfort2025redteaming,
  title  = {Red-teaming Activation Probes using Prompted LLMs},
  author = {Phil Blandfort and Robert Graham},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.00554},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00554v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.00554.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.00554)

Discussion