sMRI-based Brain Age Estimation in MCI using Persistent Homology

Debanjali Bhattacharya, Neelam Sinha
10/27/2025
q-bio.NCcs.CVeess.IV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this study, we propose the use of persistent homology -- specifically Betti curves for brain age prediction and for distinguishing between healthy and pathological aging. The proposed framework is applied to 100 structural MRI scans from the publicly available ADNI dataset. Our results indicate that Betti curve features, particularly those from dimension-1 (connected components) and dimension-2 (1D holes), effectively capture structural brain alterations associated with aging. Furthermore, clinical features are grouped into three categories based on their correlation, or lack thereof, with (i) predicted brain age and (ii) chronological age. The findings demonstrate that this approach successfully differentiates normal from pathological aging and provides a novel framework for understanding how structural brain changes relate to cognitive impairment. The proposed method serves as a foundation for developing potential biomarkers for early detection and monitoring of cognitive decline.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bhattacharya2025smribased,
  title  = {sMRI-based Brain Age Estimation in MCI using Persistent Homology},
  author = {Debanjali Bhattacharya and Neelam Sinha},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.05520},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05520v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.05520.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.05520)

Discussion