OckBench: Measuring the Efficiency of LLM Reasoning

Zheng Du, Hao Kang, Song Han, Tushar Krishna, Ligeng Zhu
11/7/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models such as GPT-4, Claude 3, and the Gemini series have improved automated reasoning and code generation. However, existing benchmarks mainly focus on accuracy and output quality, and they ignore an important factor: decoding token efficiency. In real systems, generating 10,000 tokens versus 100,000 tokens leads to large differences in latency, cost, and energy. In this work, we introduce OckBench, a model-agnostic and hardware-agnostic benchmark that evaluates both accuracy and token count for reasoning and coding tasks. Through experiments comparing multiple open- and closed-source models, we uncover that many models with comparable accuracy differ wildly in token consumption, revealing that efficiency variance is a neglected but significant axis of differentiation. We further demonstrate Pareto frontiers over the accuracy-efficiency plane and argue for an evaluation paradigm shift: we should no longer treat tokens as "free" to multiply. OckBench provides a unified platform for measuring, comparing, and guiding research in token-efficient reasoning. Our benchmarks are available at https://ockbench.github.io/ .

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{du2025ockbench,
  title  = {OckBench: Measuring the Efficiency of LLM Reasoning},
  author = {Zheng Du and Hao Kang and Song Han and Tushar Krishna and Ligeng Zhu},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.05722},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05722v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.05722.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.05722)

Discussion