Distribution-Based Feature Attribution for Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier

Xinpeng Li, Kai Ming Ting
11/12/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The proliferation of complex, black-box AI models has intensified the need for techniques that can explain their decisions. Feature attribution methods have become a popular solution for providing post-hoc explanations, yet the field has historically lacked a formal problem definition. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a formal definition for the problem of feature attribution, which stipulates that explanations be supported by an underlying probability distribution represented by the given dataset. Our analysis reveals that many existing model-agnostic methods fail to meet this criterion, while even those that do often possess other limitations. To overcome these challenges, we propose Distributional Feature Attribution eXplanations (DFAX), a novel, model-agnostic method for feature attribution. DFAX is the first feature attribution method to explain classifier predictions directly based on the data distribution. We show through extensive experiments that DFAX is more effective and efficient than state-of-the-art baselines.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{li2025distributionbased,
  title  = {Distribution-Based Feature Attribution for Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier},
  author = {Xinpeng Li and Kai Ming Ting},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.09332},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09332v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.09332.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.09332)

Discussion