Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests

Irina Saparina, Mirella Lapata
11/13/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: saparina/intentRL (1 star, last commit 2026-02-13).

Abstract

Large language models often respond to ambiguous requests by implicitly committing to one interpretation. Intent misunderstandings can frustrate users and create safety risks. To address this, we propose generating multiple interpretation-answer pairs in a single structured response to ambiguous requests. Our models are trained with reinforcement learning and customized reward functions using multiple valid answers as supervision. Experiments on conversational question answering and semantic parsing demonstrate that our method achieves higher coverage of valid answers than baseline approaches. Human evaluation confirms that predicted interpretations are highly aligned with their answers. Our approach promotes transparency with explicit interpretations, achieves efficiency by requiring only one generation step, and supports downstream applications through its structured output format.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

saparina/intentRLCommunity59%

Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests

10Shell, PythonNov 13, 20258 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{saparina2025reasoning,
  title  = {Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests},
  author = {Irina Saparina and Mirella Lapata},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.10453},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10453v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.10453.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.10453)

Discussion