SURFing to the Fundamental Limit of Jet Tagging

Ian Pang, Darius A. Faroughy, David Shih, Ranit Das, Gregor Kasieczka
11/19/2025
hep-phcs.LGhep-ex

No official code found. Best implementation: Ian-Pang/jet_cfm (0 stars, last commit 2025-11-19).

Abstract

Beyond the practical goal of improving search and measurement sensitivity through better jet tagging algorithms, there is a deeper question: what are their upper performance limits? Generative surrogate models with learned likelihood functions offer a new approach to this problem, provided the surrogate correctly captures the underlying data distribution. In this work, we introduce the SUrrogate ReFerence (SURF) method, a new approach to validating generative models. This framework enables exact Neyman-Pearson tests by training the target model on samples from another tractable surrogate, which is itself trained on real data. We argue that the EPiC-FM generative model is a valid surrogate reference for JetClass jets and apply SURF to show that modern jet taggers may already be operating close to the true statistical limit. By contrast, we find that autoregressive GPT models unphysically exaggerate top vs. QCD separation power encoded in the surrogate reference, implying that they are giving a misleading picture of the fundamental limit.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Ian-Pang/jet_cfmCommunity64%

EPiC-FM repository used for "SURFing to the Fundamental Limit of Jet Tagging"

00Shell, PythonNov 19, 202511 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pang2025surfing,
  title  = {SURFing to the Fundamental Limit of Jet Tagging},
  author = {Ian Pang and Darius A. Faroughy and David Shih and Ranit Das and Gregor Kasieczka},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.15779},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15779v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.15779.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.15779)

Discussion