Learning to Look Closer: A New Instance-Wise Loss for Small Cerebral Lesion Segmentation

Luc Bouteille, Alexander Jaus, Jens Kleesiek, Rainer Stiefelhagen, Lukas Heine
11/21/2025
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Traditional loss functions in medical image segmentation, such as Dice, often under-segment small lesions because their small relative volume contributes negligibly to the overall loss. To address this, instance-wise loss functions and metrics have been proposed to evaluate segmentation quality on a per-lesion basis. We introduce CC-DiceCE, a loss function based on the CC-Metrics framework, and compare it with the existing blob loss. Both are benchmarked against a DiceCE baseline within the nnU-Net framework, which provides a robust and standardized setup. We find that CC-DiceCE loss increases detection (recall) with minimal to no degradation in segmentation performance, though with dataset-dependent trade-offs in precision. Furthermore, our multi-dataset study shows that CC-DiceCE generally outperforms blob loss.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{bouteille2025learning,
  title  = {Learning to Look Closer: A New Instance-Wise Loss for Small Cerebral Lesion Segmentation},
  author = {Luc Bouteille and Alexander Jaus and Jens Kleesiek and Rainer Stiefelhagen and Lukas Heine},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.17146},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17146v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.17146.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.17146)

Discussion