PEFT-Bench: A Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods Benchmark

Robert Belanec, Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Maria Bielikova
11/26/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Despite the state-of-the-art performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) achieved on many tasks, their massive scale often leads to high computational and environmental costs, limiting their accessibility. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods address this challenge by reducing the number of trainable parameters while maintaining strong downstream performance. Despite the advances in PEFT methods, current evaluations remain limited (in terms of evaluated models and datasets) and difficult to reproduce. To bridge this gap, we introduce PEFT-Bench, a unified end-to-end benchmark for evaluating diverse PEFT methods on autoregressive LLMs. We demonstrate its usage across 27 NLP datasets and 7 PEFT methods. To account for different PEFT training and inference factors, we also introduce the PEFT Soft Cost Penalties (PSCP) metric, which takes trainable parameters, inference speed, and training memory usage into account.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{belanec2025peftbench,
  title  = {PEFT-Bench: A Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods Benchmark},
  author = {Robert Belanec and Branislav Pecher and Ivan Srba and Maria Bielikova},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.21285},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21285v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.21285.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.21285)

Discussion