Thompson Sampling for Multi-Objective Linear Contextual Bandit

Somangchan Park, Heesang Ann, Min-hwan Oh
11/30/2025
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We study the multi-objective linear contextual bandit problem, where multiple possible conflicting objectives must be optimized simultaneously. We propose \texttt{MOL-TS}, the \textit{first} Thompson Sampling algorithm with Pareto regret guarantees for this problem. Unlike standard approaches that compute an empirical Pareto front each round, \texttt{MOL-TS} samples parameters across objectives and efficiently selects an arm from a novel \emph{effective Pareto front}, which accounts for repeated selections over time. Our analysis shows that \texttt{MOL-TS} achieves a worst-case Pareto regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the feature vectors, $T$ is the total number of rounds, matching the best known order for randomized linear bandit algorithms for single objective. Empirical results confirm the benefits of our proposed approach, demonstrating improved regret minimization and strong multi-objective performance.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{park2025thompson,
  title  = {Thompson Sampling for Multi-Objective Linear Contextual Bandit},
  author = {Somangchan Park and Heesang Ann and Min-hwan Oh},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.00930},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00930v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.00930.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.00930)

Discussion