Object Counting with GPT-4o and GPT-5: A Comparative Study

Richard Füzesséry, Kaziwa Saleh, Sándor Szénási, Zoltán Vámossy
12/2/2025
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Zero-shot object counting attempts to estimate the number of object instances belonging to novel categories that the vision model performing the counting has never encountered during training. Existing methods typically require large amount of annotated data and often require visual exemplars to guide the counting process. However, large language models (LLMs) are powerful tools with remarkable reasoning and data understanding abilities, which suggest the possibility of utilizing them for counting tasks without any supervision. In this work we aim to leverage the visual capabilities of two multi-modal LLMs, GPT-4o and GPT-5, to perform object counting in a zero-shot manner using only textual prompts. We evaluate both models on the FSC-147 and CARPK datasets and provide a comparative analysis. Our findings show that the models achieve performance comparable to the state-of-the-art zero-shot approaches on FSC-147, in some cases, even surpass them.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{fzessry2025object,
  title  = {Object Counting with GPT-4o and GPT-5: A Comparative Study},
  author = {Richard Füzesséry and Kaziwa Saleh and Sándor Szénási and Zoltán Vámossy},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.03233},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03233v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.03233.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.03233)

Discussion