Faithfulness metric fusion: Improving the evaluation of LLM trustworthiness across domains

Ben Malin, Tatiana Kalganova, Nikolaos Boulgouris
12/5/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We present a methodology for improving the accuracy of faithfulness evaluation in Large Language Models (LLMs). The proposed methodology is based on the combination of elementary faithfulness metrics into a combined (fused) metric, for the purpose of improving the faithfulness of LLM outputs. The proposed strategy for metric fusion deploys a tree-based model to identify the importance of each metric, which is driven by the integration of human judgements evaluating the faithfulness of LLM responses. This fused metric is demonstrated to correlate more strongly with human judgements across all tested domains for faithfulness. Improving the ability to evaluate the faithfulness of LLMs, allows for greater confidence to be placed within models, allowing for their implementation in a greater diversity of scenarios. Additionally, we homogenise a collection of datasets across question answering and dialogue-based domains and implement human judgements and LLM responses within this dataset, allowing for the reproduction and trialling of faithfulness evaluation across domains.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{malin2025faithfulness,
  title  = {Faithfulness metric fusion: Improving the evaluation of LLM trustworthiness across domains},
  author = {Ben Malin and Tatiana Kalganova and Nikolaos Boulgouris},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.05700},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05700v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.05700.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.05700)

Discussion