On fine-tuning Boltz-2 for protein-protein affinity prediction

James King, Lewis Cornwall, Andrei Cristian Nica, James Day, Aaron Sim +3 more
12/6/2025
cs.LGq-bio.BM

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of protein-protein binding affinity is vital for understanding molecular interactions and designing therapeutics. We adapt Boltz-2, a state-of-the-art structure-based protein-ligand affinity predictor, for protein-protein affinity regression and evaluate it on two datasets, TCR3d and PPB-affinity. Despite high structural accuracy, Boltz-2-PPI underperforms relative to sequence-based alternatives in both small- and larger-scale data regimes. Combining embeddings from Boltz-2-PPI with sequence-based embeddings yields complementary improvements, particularly for weaker sequence models, suggesting different signals are learned by sequence- and structure-based models. Our results echo known biases associated with training with structural data and suggest that current structure-based representations are not primed for performant affinity prediction.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{king2025finetuning,
  title  = {On fine-tuning Boltz-2 for protein-protein affinity prediction},
  author = {James King and Lewis Cornwall and Andrei Cristian Nica and James Day and Aaron Sim and Neil Dalchau and Lilly Wollman and Joshua Meyers},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.06592},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06592v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.06592.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.06592)

Discussion