Empirical evaluation of the Frank-Wolfe methods for constructing white-box adversarial attacks

Kristina Korotkova, Aleksandr Katrutsa
12/11/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The construction of adversarial attacks for neural networks appears to be a crucial challenge for their deployment in various services. To estimate the adversarial robustness of a neural network, a fast and efficient approach is needed to construct adversarial attacks. Since the formalization of adversarial attack construction involves solving a specific optimization problem, we consider the problem of constructing an efficient and effective adversarial attack from a numerical optimization perspective. Specifically, we suggest utilizing advanced projection-free methods, known as modified Frank-Wolfe methods, to construct white-box adversarial attacks on the given input data. We perform a theoretical and numerical evaluation of these methods and compare them with standard approaches based on projection operations or geometrical intuition. Numerical experiments are performed on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, utilizing a multiclass logistic regression model, the convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and the Vision Transformer (ViT).

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{korotkova2025empirical,
  title  = {Empirical evaluation of the Frank-Wolfe methods for constructing white-box adversarial attacks},
  author = {Kristina Korotkova and Aleksandr Katrutsa},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.10936},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10936v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.10936.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.10936)

Discussion