Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in NLP

Vagrant Gautam
12/20/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

NLP researchers regularly invoke abstract concepts like "interpretability," "bias," "reasoning," and "stereotypes," without defining them. Each subfield has a shared understanding or conceptualization of what these terms mean and how we should treat them, and this shared understanding is the basis on which operational decisions are made: Datasets are built to evaluate these concepts, metrics are proposed to quantify them, and claims are made about systems. But what do they mean, what should they mean, and how should we measure them? I outline a seminar I created for students to explore these questions of conceptualization and operationalization, with an interdisciplinary reading list and an emphasis on discussion and critique.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gautam2025teaching,
  title  = {Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in NLP},
  author = {Vagrant Gautam},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.18505},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18505v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.18505.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.18505)

Discussion