EssayCBM: Rubric-Aligned Concept Bottleneck Models for Transparent Essay Grading

Kumar Satvik Chaudhary, Chengshuai Zhao, Fan Zhang, Yung Hin Tse, Garima Agrawal +2 more
12/23/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Understanding how automated grading systems evaluate essays remains a significant challenge for educators and students, especially when large language models function as black boxes. We introduce EssayCBM, a rubric-aligned framework that prioritizes interpretability in essay assessment. Instead of predicting grades directly from text, EssayCBM evaluates eight writing concepts, such as Thesis Clarity and Evidence Use, through dedicated prediction heads on an encoder. These concept scores form a transparent bottleneck, and a lightweight network computes the final grade using only concepts. Instructors can adjust concept predictions and instantly view the updated grade, enabling accountable human-in-the-loop evaluation. EssayCBM matches black-box performance while offering actionable, concept-level feedback through an intuitive web interface.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chaudhary2025essaycbm,
  title  = {EssayCBM: Rubric-Aligned Concept Bottleneck Models for Transparent Essay Grading},
  author = {Kumar Satvik Chaudhary and Chengshuai Zhao and Fan Zhang and Yung Hin Tse and Garima Agrawal and Yuli Deng and Huan Liu},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.20817},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20817v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.20817.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.20817)

Discussion