Sensitivity Analysis of the Consistency Assumption

Brian Knaeble, Qinyun Lin, Erich Kummerfeld, Kenneth A. Frank
12/24/2025
stat.MEcs.LGmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis informs causal inference by assessing the sensitivity of conclusions to departures from assumptions. The consistency assumption states that there are no hidden versions of treatment and that the outcome arising naturally equals the outcome arising from intervention. When reasoning about the possibility of consistency violations, it can be helpful to distinguish between covariates and versions of treatment. In the context of surgery, for example, genomic variables are covariates and the skill of a particular surgeon is a version of treatment. There may be hidden versions of treatment, and this paper addresses that concern with a new kind of sensitivity analysis. Whereas many methods for sensitivity analysis are focused on confounding by unmeasured covariates, the methodology of this paper is focused on confounding by hidden versions of treatment. In this paper, new mathematical notation is introduced to support the novel method, and example applications are described.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{knaeble2025sensitivity,
  title  = {Sensitivity Analysis of the Consistency Assumption},
  author = {Brian Knaeble and Qinyun Lin and Erich Kummerfeld and Kenneth A. Frank},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.21379},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21379v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.21379.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.21379)

Discussion