Broken Words, Broken Performance: Effect of Tokenization on Performance of LLMs

Sachin Pawar, Manoj Apte, Kshitij Jadhav, Girish Keshav Palshikar, Nitin Ramrakhiyani
12/26/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Tokenization is the first step in training any Large Language Model (LLM), where the text is split into a sequence of tokens as per the model's fixed vocabulary. This tokenization in LLMs is different from the traditional tokenization in NLP where the text is split into a sequence of "natural" words. In LLMs, a natural word may also be broken into multiple tokens due to limited vocabulary size of the LLMs (e.g., Mistral's tokenizer splits "martial" into "mart" and "ial"). In this paper, we hypothesize that such breaking of natural words negatively impacts LLM performance on various NLP tasks. To quantify this effect, we propose a set of penalty functions that compute a tokenization penalty for a given text for a specific LLM, indicating how "bad" the tokenization is. We establish statistical significance of our hypothesis on multiple NLP tasks for a set of different LLMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pawar2025broken,
  title  = {Broken Words, Broken Performance: Effect of Tokenization on Performance of LLMs},
  author = {Sachin Pawar and Manoj Apte and Kshitij Jadhav and Girish Keshav Palshikar and Nitin Ramrakhiyani},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.21933},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21933v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.21933.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.21933)

Discussion