Pruning Graphs by Adversarial Robustness Evaluation to Strengthen GNN Defenses

Yongyu Wang
11/29/2025
cs.LGcs.CR

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a dominant paradigm for learning on graph-structured data, thanks to their ability to jointly exploit node features and relational information encoded in the graph topology. This joint modeling, however, also introduces a critical weakness: perturbations or noise in either the structure or the features can be amplified through message passing, making GNNs highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks and spurious connections. In this work, we introduce a pruning framework that leverages adversarial robustness evaluation to explicitly identify and remove fragile or detrimental components of the graph. By using robustness scores as guidance, our method selectively prunes edges that are most likely to degrade model reliability, thereby yielding cleaner and more resilient graph representations. We instantiate this framework on three representative GNN architectures and conduct extensive experiments on benchmarks. The experimental results show that our approach can significantly enhance the defense capability of GNNs in the high-perturbation regime.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{wang2025pruning,
  title  = {Pruning Graphs by Adversarial Robustness Evaluation to Strengthen GNN Defenses},
  author = {Yongyu Wang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.22128},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22128v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.22128.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.22128)

Discussion