A review of NMF, PLSA, LBA, EMA, and LCA with a focus on the identifiability issue

Qianqian Qi, Peter G. M. van der Heijden
12/25/2025
stat.MLcs.LGmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Across fields such as machine learning, social science, geography, considerable attention has been given to models that factorize a nonnegative matrix into the product of two or three matrices, subject to nonnegative or row-sum-to-1 constraints. Although these models are to a large extend similar or even equivalent, they are presented under different names, and their similarity is not well known. This paper highlights similarities among five popular models, latent budget analysis (LBA), latent class analysis (LCA), end-member analysis (EMA), probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA), and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). We focus on an essential issue-identifiability-of these models and prove that the solution of LBA, EMA, LCA, PLSA is unique if and only if the solution of NMF is unique. We also provide a brief review for algorithms of these models. We illustrate the models with a time budget dataset from social science, and end the paper with a discussion of closely related models such as archetypal analysis.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{qi2025review,
  title  = {A review of NMF, PLSA, LBA, EMA, and LCA with a focus on the identifiability issue},
  author = {Qianqian Qi and Peter G. M. van der Heijden},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2512.22282},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22282v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2512.22282.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2512.22282)

Discussion