LOFA: Online Influence Maximization under Full-Bandit Feedback using Lazy Forward Selection

Jinyu Xu, Abhishek K. Umrawal
1/2/2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.SI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study the problem of influence maximization (IM) in an online setting, where the goal is to select a subset of nodes$\unicode{x2014}$called the seed set$\unicode{x2014}$at each time step over a fixed time horizon, subject to a cardinality budget constraint, to maximize the expected cumulative influence. We operate under a full-bandit feedback model, where only the influence of the chosen seed set at each time step is observed, with no additional structural information about the network or diffusion process. It is well-established that the influence function is submodular, and existing algorithms exploit this property to achieve low regret. In this work, we leverage this property further and propose the Lazy Online Forward Algorithm (LOFA), which achieves a lower empirical regret. We conduct experiments on a real-world social network to demonstrate that LOFA achieves superior performance compared to existing bandit algorithms in terms of cumulative regret and instantaneous reward.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{xu2026lofa,
  title  = {LOFA: Online Influence Maximization under Full-Bandit Feedback using Lazy Forward Selection},
  author = {Jinyu Xu and Abhishek K. Umrawal},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.00933},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00933v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.00933.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.00933)

Discussion