Tape: A Cellular Automata Benchmark for Evaluating Rule-Shift Generalization in Reinforcement Learning

Enze Pan
1/8/2026
cs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We present Tape, a controlled reinforcement-learning benchmark designed to isolate out-of-distribution (OOD) failure under latent rule shifts.Tape is derived from one-dimensional cellular automata, enabling precise train/test splits where observation and action spaces are held fixed while transition rules change. Using a reproducible evaluation pipeline, we compare model-free baselines, model-based planning with learned world models, and task-inference (meta-RL) methods. A consistent pattern emerges: methods that are strong in-distribution (ID) can collapse under heldout-rule OOD, and high-variance OOD evaluation can make rankings unstable unless experiments are sufficiently replicated.We provide (i) standardized OOD protocols, (ii) statistical reporting requirements (seeds, confidence intervals, and hypothesis tests), and (iii) information-theoretic identities connecting entropy reduction to conditional mutual information and expected posterior KL divergence, clarifying what "uncertainty reduction" objectives can and cannot guarantee under rule shifts.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{pan2026tape,
  title  = {Tape: A Cellular Automata Benchmark for Evaluating Rule-Shift Generalization in Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Enze Pan},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.04695},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04695v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.04695.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.04695)

Discussion