When to Act: Calibrated Confidence for Reliable Human Intention Prediction in Assistive Robotics

Johannes A. Gaus, Winfried Ilg, Daniel Haeufle
1/8/2026
cs.ROcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Assistive devices must determine both what a user intends to do and how reliable that prediction is before providing support. We introduce a safety-critical triggering framework based on calibrated probabilities for multimodal next-action prediction in Activities of Daily Living. Raw model confidence often fails to reflect true correctness, posing a safety risk. Post-hoc calibration aligns predicted confidence with empirical reliability and reduces miscalibration by about an order of magnitude without affecting accuracy. The calibrated confidence drives a simple ACT/HOLD rule that acts only when reliability is high and withholds assistance otherwise. This turns the confidence threshold into a quantitative safety parameter for assisted actions and enables verifiable behavior in an assistive control loop.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gaus2026when,
  title  = {When to Act: Calibrated Confidence for Reliable Human Intention Prediction in Assistive Robotics},
  author = {Johannes A. Gaus and Winfried Ilg and Daniel Haeufle},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.04982},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04982v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.04982.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.04982)

Discussion