Evaluating Accounting Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models

Jie Zhou, Xin Chen, Jie Zhang, Hai Li, Jie Wang +1 more
1/10/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models are transforming learning, cognition, and research across many fields. Effectively integrating them into professional domains, such as accounting, is a key challenge for enterprise digital transformation. To address this, we define vertical domain accounting reasoning and propose evaluation criteria derived from an analysis of the training data characteristics of representative GLM models. These criteria support systematic study of accounting reasoning and provide benchmarks for performance improvement. Using this framework, we evaluate GLM-6B, GLM-130B, GLM-4, and OpenAI GPT-4 on accounting reasoning tasks. Results show that prompt design significantly affects performance, with GPT-4 demonstrating the strongest capability. Despite these gains, current models remain insufficient for real-world enterprise accounting, indicating the need for further optimization to unlock their full practical value.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhou2026evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating Accounting Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models},
  author = {Jie Zhou and Xin Chen and Jie Zhang and Hai Li and Jie Wang and Zhe Li},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.06707},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06707v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.06707.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.06707)

Discussion