Scientific production in the era of Large Language Models

Keigo Kusumegi, Xinyu Yang, Paul Ginsparg, Mathijs de Vaan, Toby Stuart +1 more
1/19/2026
cs.DLcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly reshaping scientific research. We analyze these changes in multiple, large-scale datasets with 2.1M preprints, 28K peer review reports, and 246M online accesses to scientific documents. We find: 1) scientists adopting LLMs to draft manuscripts demonstrate a large increase in paper production, ranging from 23.7-89.3% depending on scientific field and author background, 2) LLM use has reversed the relationship between writing complexity and paper quality, leading to an influx of manuscripts that are linguistically complex but substantively underwhelming, and 3) LLM adopters access and cite more diverse prior work, including books and younger, less-cited documents. These findings highlight a stunning shift in scientific production that will likely require a change in how journals, funding agencies, and tenure committees evaluate scientific works.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kusumegi2026scientific,
  title  = {Scientific production in the era of Large Language Models},
  author = {Keigo Kusumegi and Xinyu Yang and Paul Ginsparg and Mathijs de Vaan and Toby Stuart and Yian Yin},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.13187},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13187v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.13187.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.13187)

Discussion