Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs

Wei Zhou, Jun Zhou, Haoyu Wang, Zhenghao Li, Qikang He +14 more
1/22/2026
cs.DBcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them, which is essential for a wide range of data-centric applications. Driven by (i) rising demands for application-ready data (e.g., for analytics, visualization, decision-making), (ii) increasingly powerful LLM techniques, and (iii) the emergence of infrastructures that facilitate flexible agent construction (e.g., using Databricks Unity Catalog), LLM-enhanced methods are rapidly becoming a transformative and potentially dominant paradigm for data preparation. By investigating hundreds of recent literature works, this paper presents a systematic review of this evolving landscape, focusing on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks. First, we characterize the fundamental paradigm shift, from rule-based, model-specific pipelines to prompt-driven, context-aware, and agentic preparation workflows. Next, we introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning (e.g., standardization, error processing, imputation), data integration (e.g., entity matching, schema matching), and data enrichment (e.g., data annotation, profiling). For each task, we survey representative techniques, and highlight their respective strengths (e.g., improved generalization, semantic understanding) and limitations (e.g., the prohibitive cost of scaling LLMs, persistent hallucinations even in advanced agents, the mismatch between advanced methods and weak evaluation). Moreover, we analyze commonly used datasets and evaluation metrics (the empirical part). Finally, we discuss open research challenges and outline a forward-looking roadmap that emphasizes scalable LLM-data systems, principled designs for reliable agentic workflows, and robust evaluation protocols.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhou2026llms,
  title  = {Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs},
  author = {Wei Zhou and Jun Zhou and Haoyu Wang and Zhenghao Li and Qikang He and Shaokun Han and Guoliang Li and Xuanhe Zhou and Yeye He and Chunwei Liu and Zirui Tang and Bin Wang and Shen Tang and Kai Zuo and Yuyu Luo and Zhenzhe Zheng and Conghui He and Jingren Zhou and Fan Wu},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.17058},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17058v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.17058.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.17058)

Discussion