Fixed Aggregation Features Can Rival GNNs

Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka Burkholz
1/27/2026
cs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: celrm/fixed-aggregation-features (0 stars, last commit 2026-01-15).

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely believed to excel at node representation learning through trainable neighborhood aggregations. We challenge this view by introducing Fixed Aggregation Features (FAFs), a training-free approach that transforms graph learning tasks into tabular problems. This simple shift enables the use of well-established tabular methods, offering strong interpretability and the flexibility to deploy diverse classifiers. Across 14 benchmarks, well-tuned multilayer perceptrons trained on FAFs rival or outperform state-of-the-art GNNs and graph transformers on 12 tasks -- often using only mean aggregation. The only exceptions are the Roman Empire and Minesweeper datasets, which typically require unusually deep GNNs. To explain the theoretical possibility of non-trainable aggregations, we connect our findings to Kolmogorov-Arnold representations and discuss when mean aggregation can be sufficient. In conclusion, our results call for (i) richer benchmarks benefiting from learning diverse neighborhood aggregations, (ii) strong tabular baselines as standard, and (iii) employing and advancing tabular models for graph data to gain new insights into related tasks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Official code for the paper "Fixed Aggregation Features Can Rival GNNs".

01Shell, PythonJan 15, 20269 months ago
graph-learninggraph-neural-networksnode-classificationpytorch-geometric

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rubiomadrigal2026fixed,
  title  = {Fixed Aggregation Features Can Rival GNNs},
  author = {Celia Rubio-Madrigal and Rebekka Burkholz},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.19449},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19449v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.19449.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.19449)

Discussion