Intersectional Fairness via Mixed-Integer Optimization

Jiří Němeček, Mark Kozdoba, Illia Kryvoviaz, Tomáš Pevný, Jakub Mareček
1/27/2026
cs.LGcs.AImath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The deployment of Artificial Intelligence in high-risk domains, such as finance and healthcare, necessitates models that are both fair and transparent. While regulatory frameworks, including the EU's AI Act, mandate bias mitigation, they are deliberately vague about the definition of bias. In line with existing research, we argue that true fairness requires addressing bias at the intersections of protected groups. We propose a unified framework that leverages Mixed-Integer Optimization (MIO) to train intersectionally fair and intrinsically interpretable classifiers. We prove the equivalence of two measures of intersectional fairness (MSD and SPSF) in detecting the most unfair subgroup and empirically demonstrate that our MIO-based algorithm improves performance in finding bias. We train high-performing, interpretable classifiers that bound intersectional bias below an acceptable threshold, offering a robust solution for regulated industries and beyond.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{nmeek2026intersectional,
  title  = {Intersectional Fairness via Mixed-Integer Optimization},
  author = {Jiří Němeček and Mark Kozdoba and Illia Kryvoviaz and Tomáš Pevný and Jakub Mareček},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.19595},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19595v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.19595.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.19595)

Discussion