$\mathbb{R}^{2k}$ is Theoretically Large Enough for Embedding-based Top-k Retrieval

Zihao Wang, Hang Yin, Lihui Liu, Hanghang Tong, Yangqiu Song +2 more
1/28/2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.IR

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper studies the minimal dimension required to embed subset memberships ($m$ elements and ${m\choose k}$ subsets of at most $k$ elements) into vector spaces, denoted as Minimal Embeddable Dimension (MED). The tight bounds of MED are derived theoretically and supported empirically for various notions of "distances" or "similarities," including the $\ell_2$ metric, inner product, and cosine similarity. In addition, we conduct numerical simulation in a more achievable setting, where the ${m\choose k}$ subset embeddings are chosen as the centroid of the embeddings of the contained elements. Our simulation easily realizes a logarithmic dependency between the MED and the number of elements to embed. These findings imply that embedding-based retrieval limitations stem primarily from learnability challenges, not geometric constraints, guiding future algorithm design.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2026mathbbrk,
  title  = {$\mathbb{R}^{2k}$ is Theoretically Large Enough for Embedding-based Top-k Retrieval},
  author = {Zihao Wang and Hang Yin and Lihui Liu and Hanghang Tong and Yangqiu Song and Ginny Wong and Simon See},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.20844},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20844v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.20844.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.20844)

Discussion