FOCUS: DLLMs Know How to Tame Their Compute Bound

Kaihua Liang, Xin Tan, An Zhong, Hong Xu, Marco Canini
1/30/2026
cs.LGcs.ARcs.CL

Official code: sands-lab/FOCUS (18 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2026-04-05).

Abstract

Diffusion Large Language Models (DLLMs) offer a compelling alternative to Auto-Regressive models, but their deployment is constrained by high decoding cost. In this work, we identify a key inefficiency in DLLM decoding: while computation is parallelized over token blocks, only a small subset of tokens is decodable at each diffusion step, causing most compute to be wasted on non-decodable tokens. We further observe a strong correlation between attention-derived token importance and token-wise decoding probability. Based on this insight, we propose FOCUS -- an inference system designed for DLLMs. By dynamically focusing computation on decodable tokens and evicting non-decodable ones on-the-fly, FOCUS increases the effective batch size, alleviating compute limitations and enabling scalable throughput. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that FOCUS achieves up to 3.52$\times$ throughput improvement over the production-grade engine LMDeploy, while preserving or improving generation quality across multiple benchmarks. The FOCUS system is publicly available on GitHub: https://github.com/sands-lab/FOCUS.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

sands-lab/FOCUSOfficial100%
Apache-2.0

[ICML'26] Official implementation of "FOCUS: DLLMs Know How to Tame Their Compute Bound".

182C, C++Jan 29, 20266 months agoApache-2.0

Cite this paper

@article{liang2026focus,
  title  = {FOCUS: DLLMs Know How to Tame Their Compute Bound},
  author = {Kaihua Liang and Xin Tan and An Zhong and Hong Xu and Marco Canini},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.23278},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23278v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.23278.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.23278)

Discussion