LogicGaze: Benchmarking Causal Consistency in Visual Narratives via Counterfactual Verification

Rory Driscoll, Alexandros Christoforos, Chadbourne Davis
1/30/2026
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

While sequential reasoning enhances the capability of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to execute complex multimodal tasks, their reliability in grounding these reasoning chains within actual visual evidence remains insufficiently explored. We introduce LogicGaze, a novel benchmark framework designed to rigorously interrogate whether VLMs can validate sequential causal chains against visual inputs, specifically targeting the pervasive issue of hallucination. Curated from 40,000 video segments from ShareGPT4Video and a subset of Flickr30k imagery, LogicGaze integrates causal sequences with visually contradictory yet linguistically plausible perturbations, compelling models to verify the authenticity of each reasoning step. Our tripartite evaluation protocol - Causal Validation, Grounded Narrative Synthesis, and Perturbation Rejection - exposes significant vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art VLMs such as Qwen2.5-VL-72B. LogicGaze advocates for robust, trustworthy multimodal reasoning, with all resources publicly available in an anonymized repository.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{driscoll2026logicgaze,
  title  = {LogicGaze: Benchmarking Causal Consistency in Visual Narratives via Counterfactual Verification},
  author = {Rory Driscoll and Alexandros Christoforos and Chadbourne Davis},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.00292},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00292v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.00292.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.00292)

Discussion