Detecting AI-Generated Content in Academic Peer Reviews

Siyuan Shen, Kai Wang
1/30/2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The growing availability of large language models (LLMs) has raised questions about their role in academic peer review. This study examines the temporal emergence of AI-generated content in peer reviews by applying a detection model trained on historical reviews to later review cycles at International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) and Nature Communications (NC). We observe minimal detection of AI-generated content before 2022, followed by a substantial increase through 2025, with approximately 20% of ICLR reviews and 12% of Nature Communications reviews classified as AI-generated in 2025. The most pronounced growth of AI-generated reviews in NC occurs between the third and fourth quarter of 2024. Together, these findings provide suggestive evidence of a rapidly increasing presence of AI-assisted content in peer review and highlight the need for further study of its implications for scholarly evaluation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{shen2026detecting,
  title  = {Detecting AI-Generated Content in Academic Peer Reviews},
  author = {Siyuan Shen and Kai Wang},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.00319},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00319v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.00319.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.00319)

Discussion