RoDiF: Robust Direct Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Policies with Corrupted Human Feedback

Amitesh Vatsa, Zhixian Xie, Wanxin Jin
1/31/2026
cs.ROcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Diffusion policies are a powerful paradigm for robotic control, but fine-tuning them with human preferences is fundamentally challenged by the multi-step structure of the denoising process. To overcome this, we introduce a Unified Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulation that coherently integrates the diffusion denoising chain with environmental dynamics, enabling reward-free Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) for diffusion policies. Building on this formulation, we propose RoDiF (Robust Direct Fine-Tuning), a method that explicitly addresses corrupted human preferences. RoDiF reinterprets the DPO objective through a geometric hypothesis-cutting perspective and employs a conservative cutting strategy to achieve robustness without assuming any specific noise distribution. Extensive experiments on long-horizon manipulation tasks show that RoDiF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, effectively steering pretrained diffusion policies of diverse architectures to human-preferred modes, while maintaining strong performance even under 30% corrupted preference labels.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{vatsa2026rodif,
  title  = {RoDiF: Robust Direct Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Policies with Corrupted Human Feedback},
  author = {Amitesh Vatsa and Zhixian Xie and Wanxin Jin},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.00886},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00886v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.00886.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.00886)

Discussion