Exposing Vulnerabilities in Explanation for Time Series Classifiers via Dual-Target Attacks

Bohan Wang, Zewen Liu, Lu Lin, Hui Liu, Li Xiong +2 more
2/2/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Interpretable time series deep learning systems are often assessed by checking temporal consistency on explanations, implicitly treating this as evidence of robustness. We show that this assumption can fail: Predictions and explanations can be adversarially decoupled, enabling targeted misclassification while the explanation remains plausible and consistent with a chosen reference rationale. We propose TSEF (Time Series Explanation Fooler), a dual-target attack that jointly manipulates the classifier and explainer outputs. In contrast to single-objective misclassification attacks that disrupt explanation and spread attribution mass broadly, TSEF achieves targeted prediction changes while keeping explanations consistent with the reference. Across multiple datasets and explainer backbones, our results consistently reveal that explanation stability is a misleading proxy for decision robustness and motivate coupling-aware robustness evaluations for trustworthy time series tasks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2026exposing,
  title  = {Exposing Vulnerabilities in Explanation for Time Series Classifiers via Dual-Target Attacks},
  author = {Bohan Wang and Zewen Liu and Lu Lin and Hui Liu and Li Xiong and Ming Jin and Wei Jin},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.02763},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02763v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.02763.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.02763)

Discussion