BASS: Benchmarking Audio LMs for Musical Structure and Semantic Reasoning

Min Jang, Orevaoghene Ahia, Nazif Tamer, Sachin Kumar, Yulia Tsvetkov +1 more
2/3/2026
cs.SDcs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: minjang10/bass_music_benchmark (3 stars, last commit 2026-04-13).

Abstract

Music understanding is a complex task that often requires reasoning over both structural and semantic elements of audio. We introduce BASS, designed to evaluate music understanding and reasoning in audio language models across four broad categories: structural segmentation, lyric transcription, musicological analysis, and artist collaboration. BASS comprises 2658 questions spanning 12 tasks, 1993 unique songs and covering over 138 hours of music from a wide range of genres and tracks, crafted to assess musicological knowledge and reasoning in real-world scenarios. We evaluate 14 open-source and frontier multimodal LMs, finding that even state-of-the-art models struggle on higher-level reasoning tasks such as structural segmentation and artist collaboration, while performing best on lyric transcription. Our analysis reveals that current models leverage linguistic priors effectively but remain limited in reasoning over musical structure, vocal, and musicological attributes. BASS provides an evaluation framework with widespread applications in music recommendation and search and has the potential to guide the development of audio LMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

BASS: Benchmarking Audio LMs for Musical Structure and Semantic Reasoning

30PythonJan 21, 20266 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jang2026bass,
  title  = {BASS: Benchmarking Audio LMs for Musical Structure and Semantic Reasoning},
  author = {Min Jang and Orevaoghene Ahia and Nazif Tamer and Sachin Kumar and Yulia Tsvetkov and Noah A. Smith},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.04085},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04085v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.04085.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.04085)

Discussion