Are AI Capabilities Increasing Exponentially? A Competing Hypothesis

Haosen Ge, Hamsa Bastani, Osbert Bastani
2/4/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Rapidly increasing AI capabilities have substantial real-world consequences, ranging from AI safety concerns to labor market consequences. The Model Evaluation & Threat Research (METR) report argues that AI capabilities have exhibited exponential growth since 2019. In this note, we argue that the data does not support exponential growth, even in shorter-term horizons. Whereas the METR study claims that fitting sigmoid/logistic curves results in inflection points far in the future, we fit a sigmoid curve to their current data and find that the inflection point has already passed. In addition, we propose a more complex model that decomposes AI capabilities into base and reasoning capabilities, exhibiting individual rates of improvement. We prove that this model supports our hypothesis that AI capabilities will exhibit an inflection point in the near future. Our goal is not to establish a rigorous forecast of our own, but to highlight the fragility of existing forecasts of exponential growth.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ge2026capabilities,
  title  = {Are AI Capabilities Increasing Exponentially? A Competing Hypothesis},
  author = {Haosen Ge and Hamsa Bastani and Osbert Bastani},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.04836},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04836v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.04836.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.04836)

Discussion