The Condensate Theorem: Transformers are O(n), Not $O(n^2)$

Jorge L. Ruiz Williams
2/6/2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We present the Condensate Theorem: attention sparsity is a learned topological property, not an architectural constraint. Through empirical analysis of trained language models, we find that attention mass concentrates on a distinct topological manifold -- and this manifold can be identified dynamically without checking every position. We prove a general result: for any query, projecting attention onto the Condensate Manifold (Anchor + Window + Dynamic Top-k) achieves 100% output equivalence with full $O(n^2)$ attention. This is not an approximation -- it is lossless parity. We validate this across GPT-2, Pythia, Qwen2, TinyLlama, and Mistral, demonstrating bit-exact token matching on 1,500+ generated tokens. By mapping this topology to hardware, our Topological Attention kernel achieves a 159x measured speedup at 131K tokens (3.94ms vs 628ms) and a projected >1,200x speedup at 1M tokens, reducing inference costs by >99.9% compared to Flash Attention. We conclude that the quadratic bottleneck is an artifact of naive implementation, not intelligence.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{williams2026condensate,
  title  = {The Condensate Theorem: Transformers are O(n), Not $O(n^2)$},
  author = {Jorge L. Ruiz Williams},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.06317},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06317v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.06317.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.06317)

Discussion