VLRS-Bench: A Vision-Language Reasoning Benchmark for Remote Sensing

Zhiming Luo, Di Wang, Haonan Guo, Jing Zhang, Bo Du
2/4/2026
cs.CVcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: MiliLab/VLRS-Bench (7 stars, last commit 2026-02-13).

Abstract

Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have enabled complex reasoning. However, existing remote sensing (RS) benchmarks remain heavily biased toward perception tasks, such as object recognition and scene classification. This limitation hinders the development of MLLMs for cognitively demanding RS applications. To address this, , we propose a Vision Language ReaSoning Benchmark (VLRS-Bench), which is the first benchmark exclusively dedicated to complex RS reasoning. Structured across the three core dimensions of Cognition, Decision, and Prediction, VLRS-Bench comprises 2,000 question-answer pairs with an average length of 71 words, spanning 14 tasks and up to eight temporal phases. VLRS-Bench is constructed via a specialized pipeline that integrates RS-specific priors and expert knowledge to ensure geospatial realism and reasoning complexity. Experimental results reveal significant bottlenecks in existing state-of-the-art MLLMs, providing critical insights for advancing multimodal reasoning within the remote sensing community.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MiliLab/VLRS-BenchCommunity73%

Official repo for "VLRS-Bench: A Vision-Language Reasoning Benchmark for Remote Sensing"

71Feb 4, 20268 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{luo2026vlrsbench,
  title  = {VLRS-Bench: A Vision-Language Reasoning Benchmark for Remote Sensing},
  author = {Zhiming Luo and Di Wang and Haonan Guo and Jing Zhang and Bo Du},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.07045},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07045v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.07045.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.07045)

Discussion