Fast and Robust Likelihood-Guided Diffusion Posterior Sampling with Amortized Variational Inference

Léon Zheng, Thomas Hirtz, Yazid Janati, Eric Moulines
2/6/2026
stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Zero-shot diffusion posterior sampling offers a flexible framework for inverse problems by accommodating arbitrary degradation operators at test time, but incurs high computational cost due to repeated likelihood-guided updates. In contrast, previous amortized diffusion approaches enable fast inference by replacing likelihood-based sampling with implicit inference models, but at the expense of robustness to unseen degradations. We introduce an amortization strategy for diffusion posterior sampling that preserves explicit likelihood guidance by amortizing the inner optimization problems arising in variational diffusion posterior sampling. This accelerates inference for in-distribution degradations while maintaining robustness to previously unseen operators, thereby improving the trade-off between efficiency and flexibility in diffusion-based inverse problems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zheng2026fast,
  title  = {Fast and Robust Likelihood-Guided Diffusion Posterior Sampling with Amortized Variational Inference},
  author = {Léon Zheng and Thomas Hirtz and Yazid Janati and Eric Moulines},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.07102},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07102v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.07102.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.07102)

Discussion