Fairness Aware Reward Optimization

Ching Lam Choi, Vighnesh Subramaniam, Phillip Isola, Antonio Torralba, Stefanie Jegelka
2/8/2026
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Demographic skews in human preference data propagate systematic unfairness through reward models into aligned LLMs. We introduce Fairness Aware Reward Optimization (Faro), an in-processing framework that trains reward models under demographic parity, equalized odds, or counterfactual fairness constraints. We provide the first theoretical analysis of reward-level fairness in LLM alignment, establishing: (i) provable fairness certificates for Faro-trained rewards with controllable slack; a (ii) formal characterization of the accuracy-fairness trade-off induced by KL-regularized fine-tuning, proving fairness transfers from reward to policy; and the (iii) existence of a non-empty Pareto frontier. Unlike pre- and post-processing methods, Faro ensures reward models are simultaneously ordinal (ranking correctly), cardinal (calibrated), and fair. Across multiple LLMs and benchmarks, Faro significantly reduces bias and harmful generations while maintaining or improving model quality.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{choi2026fairness,
  title  = {Fairness Aware Reward Optimization},
  author = {Ching Lam Choi and Vighnesh Subramaniam and Phillip Isola and Antonio Torralba and Stefanie Jegelka},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.07799},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07799v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.07799.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.07799)

Discussion