ViMultiChoice: Toward a Method That Gives Explanation for Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension in Vietnamese

Trung Tien Cao, Lam Minh Thai, Nghia Hieu Nguyen, Duc-Vu Nguyen, Ngan Luu-Thuy Nguyen
2/10/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Multiple-choice Reading Comprehension (MCRC) models aim to select the correct answer from a set of candidate options for a given question. However, they typically lack the ability to explain the reasoning behind their choices. In this paper, we introduce a novel Vietnamese dataset designed to train and evaluate MCRC models with explanation generation capabilities. Furthermore, we propose ViMultiChoice, a new method specifically designed for modeling Vietnamese reading comprehension that jointly predicts the correct answer and generates a corresponding explanation. Experimental results demonstrate that ViMultiChoice outperforms existing MCRC baselines, achieving state-of-the-art (SotA) performance on both the ViMMRC 2.0 benchmark and the newly introduced dataset. Additionally, we show that jointly training option decision and explanation generation leads to significant improvements in multiple-choice accuracy.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cao2026vimultichoice,
  title  = {ViMultiChoice: Toward a Method That Gives Explanation for Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension in Vietnamese},
  author = {Trung Tien Cao and Lam Minh Thai and Nghia Hieu Nguyen and Duc-Vu Nguyen and Ngan Luu-Thuy Nguyen},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.09961},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09961v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.09961.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.09961)

Discussion