RBCorr: Response Bias Correction in Language Models

Om Bhatt, Anna A. Ivanova
2/12/2026
cs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Language models (LMs) are known to be prone to response biases, which present as option preference biases in fixed-response questions. It is therefore imperative to develop low-cost and effective response bias correction methods to improve LM performance and enable more accurate evaluations of model abilities. Here, we propose a simple response bias correction strategy ($\texttt{RBCorr}$) and test it on 12 open-weight language models using yes-no, entailment, and multiple choice questions. We show that response bias is prevalent in LMs pre-correction and that $\texttt{RBCorr}$ effectively eliminates bias and boosts model performance. We also explore the generalizability of bias behavior across models, datasets, and prompt formats, showing that LogProbs-based correction is highly dependent on all three of these aspects. Overall, $\texttt{RBCorr}$ is an easy-to-use method that can boost the performance of smaller LMs and ensure that LM performance on closed-response benchmarks aligns more closely with their true capabilities.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bhatt2026rbcorr,
  title  = {RBCorr: Response Bias Correction in Language Models},
  author = {Om Bhatt and Anna A. Ivanova},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.12445},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12445v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.12445.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.12445)

Discussion