Tight Bounds for Logistic Regression with Large Stepsize Gradient Descent in Low Dimension

Michael Crawshaw, Mingrui Liu
2/12/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We consider the optimization problem of minimizing the logistic loss with gradient descent to train a linear model for binary classification with separable data. With a budget of $T$ iterations, it was recently shown that an accelerated $1/T^2$ rate is possible by choosing a large step size $η= Θ(γ^2 T)$ (where $γ$ is the dataset's margin) despite the resulting non-monotonicity of the loss. In this paper, we provide a tighter analysis of gradient descent for this problem when the data is two-dimensional: we show that GD with a sufficiently large learning rate $η$ finds a point with loss smaller than $\mathcal{O}(1/(ηT))$, as long as $T \geq Ω(n/γ+ 1/γ^2)$, where $n$ is the dataset size. Our improved rate comes from a tighter bound on the time $τ$ that it takes for GD to transition from unstable (non-monotonic loss) to stable (monotonic loss), via a fine-grained analysis of the oscillatory dynamics of GD in the subspace orthogonal to the max-margin classifier. We also provide a lower bound of $τ$ matching our upper bound up to logarithmic factors, showing that our analysis is tight.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{crawshaw2026tight,
  title  = {Tight Bounds for Logistic Regression with Large Stepsize Gradient Descent in Low Dimension},
  author = {Michael Crawshaw and Mingrui Liu},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.12471},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12471v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.12471.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.12471)

Discussion