A Geometric Analysis of Small-sized Language Model Hallucinations

Emanuele Ricco, Elia Onofri, Lorenzo Cima, Stefano Cresci, Roberto Di Pietro
2/16/2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Hallucinations -- fluent but factually incorrect responses -- pose a major challenge to the reliability of language models, especially in multi-step or agentic settings. This work investigates hallucinations in small-sized LLMs through a geometric perspective, starting from the hypothesis that when models generate multiple responses to the same prompt, genuine ones exhibit tighter clustering in the embedding space, we prove this hypothesis and, leveraging this geometrical insight, we also show that it is possible to achieve a consistent level of separability. This latter result is used to introduce a label-efficient propagation method that classifies large collections of responses from just 30-50 annotations, achieving F1 scores above 90%. Our findings, framing hallucinations from a geometric perspective in the embedding space, complement traditional knowledge-centric and single-response evaluation paradigms, paving the way for further research.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ricco2026geometric,
  title  = {A Geometric Analysis of Small-sized Language Model Hallucinations},
  author = {Emanuele Ricco and Elia Onofri and Lorenzo Cima and Stefano Cresci and Roberto Di Pietro},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.14778},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14778v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.14778.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.14778)

Discussion