SourceBench: Can AI Answers Reference Quality Web Sources?

Hexi Jin, Stephen Liu, Yuheng Li, Simran Malik, Yiying Zhang
2/18/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly answer queries by citing web sources, but existing evaluations emphasize answer correctness rather than evidence quality. We introduce SourceBench, a benchmark for measuring the quality of cited web sources across 100 real-world queries spanning informational, factual, argumentative, social, and shopping intents. SourceBench uses an eight-metric framework covering content quality (content relevance, factual accuracy, objectivity) and page-level signals (e.g., freshness, authority/accountability, clarity), and includes a human-labeled dataset with a calibrated LLM-based evaluator that matches expert judgments closely. We evaluate eight LLMs, Google Search, and three AI search tools over 3996 cited sources using SourceBench and conduct further experiments to understand the evaluation results. Overall, our work reveals four key new insights that can guide future research in the direction of GenAI and web search.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jin2026sourcebench,
  title  = {SourceBench: Can AI Answers Reference Quality Web Sources?},
  author = {Hexi Jin and Stephen Liu and Yuheng Li and Simran Malik and Yiying Zhang},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.16942},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16942v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.16942.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.16942)

Discussion