Evaluating Graphical Perception Capabilities of Vision Transformers

Poonam Poonam, Pere-Pau Vázquez, Timo Ropinski
2/20/2026
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Vision Transformers, ViTs, have emerged as a powerful alternative to convolutional neural networks, CNNs, in a variety of image-based tasks. While CNNs have previously been evaluated for their ability to perform graphical perception tasks, which are essential for interpreting visualizations, the perceptual capabilities of ViTs remain largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate the performance of ViTs in elementary visual judgment tasks inspired by the foundational studies of Cleveland and McGill, which quantified the accuracy of human perception across different visual encodings. Inspired by their study, we benchmark ViTs against CNNs and human participants in a series of controlled graphical perception tasks. Our results reveal that, although ViTs demonstrate strong performance in general vision tasks, their alignment with human-like graphical perception in the visualization domain is limited. This study highlights key perceptual gaps and points to important considerations for the application of ViTs in visualization systems and graphical perceptual modeling.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{poonam2026evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating Graphical Perception Capabilities of Vision Transformers},
  author = {Poonam Poonam and Pere-Pau Vázquez and Timo Ropinski},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.18178},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18178v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.18178.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.18178)

Discussion