VIGiA: Instructional Video Guidance via Dialogue Reasoning and Retrieval

Diogo Glória-Silva, David Semedo, João Maglhães
2/22/2026
cs.CVcs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: dmgcsilva/vigia (0 stars, last commit 2026-02-21).

Abstract

We introduce VIGiA, a novel multimodal dialogue model designed to understand and reason over complex, multi-step instructional video action plans. Unlike prior work which focuses mainly on text-only guidance, or treats vision and language in isolation, VIGiA supports grounded, plan-aware dialogue that requires reasoning over visual inputs, instructional plans, and interleaved user interactions. To this end, VIGiA incorporates two key capabilities: (1) multimodal plan reasoning, enabling the model to align uni- and multimodal queries with the current task plan and respond accurately; and (2) plan-based retrieval, allowing it to retrieve relevant plan steps in either textual or visual representations. Experiments were done on a novel dataset with rich Instructional Video Dialogues aligned with Cooking and DIY plans. Our evaluation shows that VIGiA outperforms existing state-of-the-art models on all tasks in a conversational plan guidance setting, reaching over 90\% accuracy on plan-aware VQA.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

dmgcsilva/vigiaCommunity58%

Official repo with the VIGiA code, from the paper "VIGiA: Instructional Video Guidance via Dialogue Reasoning and Retrieval", published on EACL 2026.

00Shell, PythonJan 22, 20268 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{glriasilva2026vigia,
  title  = {VIGiA: Instructional Video Guidance via Dialogue Reasoning and Retrieval},
  author = {Diogo Glória-Silva and David Semedo and João Maglhães},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.19146},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19146v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.19146.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.19146)

Discussion